Disclaimer
Rep. Daus is not responsible for any of the comments posted on this blog. Let's keep the comments clean and refrain from bashing. Thanks!
Sunday, March 4, 2007
Legislation to be debated the week of March 5th
Impoundement of Animals:
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Conservation and Natural Resources by a vote of 10 to 0. Currently, any neglected or abused animal may be impounded. This bill prohibits a farm animal weighing more than 50 pounds from being impounded until the district state veterinarian of the Department of Agriculture has examined the animal and determined the animal to be in imminent danger of loss of life or has determined that the condition or conditions deemed to be inviolation cannot reasonably be rectified before the disposition hearing. If before the disposition hearing, reasonable attempts to correct the condition have not been made and approved by the veterinarian during a required follow-up visit, the animal may beimpounded or destroyed. If an abused or neglected farm animal in the possession of a caregiver is impounded, the authority having custody of the animal is required to make a diligent effort to notify the owner in writing that the animal has been impounded.
PROPONENTS: Supporters say that caring for an animal that hasbeen seized from its owner can be very expensive, and often the animal is determined to be safe and the abuse case is notpursued. The bill changes the laws to permit the owner to continue to care for the animal while the state veterinarian examines the animal and investigates the case. Owners should have an opportunity to rectify the situation before their animals are taken from them. Testifying for the bill were Representative Viebrock; MissouriFarm Bureau; and Missouri Federation of Animal Owners.
OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that they are concerned about the exacerbation and suffering by animals that need better care. A one-day delay by the state veterinarian in checking onthe animals could mean life or death for the animals. Testifying against the bill were Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation; and Humane Society of Missouri.
OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that there arecurrently only four state district veterinarians and four federal veterinarians in the state who are able to examine the animals. Due to a statewide veterinarian workforce shortage, they feel that it is critically important to have an unbiased expert to evaluate the animals. Testifying on the bill was Department of Agriculture.
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Conservation and Natural Resources by a vote of 10 to 0. Currently, any neglected or abused animal may be impounded. This bill prohibits a farm animal weighing more than 50 pounds from being impounded until the district state veterinarian of the Department of Agriculture has examined the animal and determined the animal to be in imminent danger of loss of life or has determined that the condition or conditions deemed to be inviolation cannot reasonably be rectified before the disposition hearing. If before the disposition hearing, reasonable attempts to correct the condition have not been made and approved by the veterinarian during a required follow-up visit, the animal may beimpounded or destroyed. If an abused or neglected farm animal in the possession of a caregiver is impounded, the authority having custody of the animal is required to make a diligent effort to notify the owner in writing that the animal has been impounded.
PROPONENTS: Supporters say that caring for an animal that hasbeen seized from its owner can be very expensive, and often the animal is determined to be safe and the abuse case is notpursued. The bill changes the laws to permit the owner to continue to care for the animal while the state veterinarian examines the animal and investigates the case. Owners should have an opportunity to rectify the situation before their animals are taken from them. Testifying for the bill were Representative Viebrock; MissouriFarm Bureau; and Missouri Federation of Animal Owners.
OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that they are concerned about the exacerbation and suffering by animals that need better care. A one-day delay by the state veterinarian in checking onthe animals could mean life or death for the animals. Testifying against the bill were Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation; and Humane Society of Missouri.
OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that there arecurrently only four state district veterinarians and four federal veterinarians in the state who are able to examine the animals. Due to a statewide veterinarian workforce shortage, they feel that it is critically important to have an unbiased expert to evaluate the animals. Testifying on the bill was Department of Agriculture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This bill was third read and finally passed on Thursday. It now will move tot he Senate. This was an issue that drew quite a few emails to the office over the past 2-3 weeks.
Post a Comment